Meeting Data Stream

Your Team Spends 31 Hours a Week in Meetings. What Comes Out of Them?

Meetings are the richest data stream in your business. Every decision, every client signal, every commitment lives inside a transcript that nobody reads. That makes meetings the biggest blind spot in professional services.

Q1 Client Review
Teams Recording - 47 min
47:12
Meeting Timeline
Decision
Discussion
Action Item
Off-Topic
Attendees
SC
JR
KP
AM
+2 more
Client "We are looking at expanding into two new regions this year, so we will need to discuss scaling the contract..." Revenue Signal
Partner "That is great news. Let us come back to that. First, I wanted to cover the Q1 numbers."
Partner "So we are agreed on the revised timeline, yes? Everyone comfortable with the June deadline?" Decision
Associate "I will send over the updated scope document by Friday." Never sent Action Item
Key Moments Surfaced
Decisions
3
Agreed, 1 unactioned
Actions
5
Assigned, 2 overdue
Signals
1
Expansion, no follow-up
31hrs
Average hours per employee per week spent in meetings
47%
Action items from meetings that are never completed
28%
Client meetings containing cross-sell signals never actioned
62%
Meetings that overrun with no documented outcome

Trusted by

Cyber Essentials
99.5% Uptime SLA
£2B+ Client Revenue Managed
UK-Based Servers

The Meeting Blind Spot

Your team records meetings. Some even take notes. But recording is not analysing. And notes capture what someone thought was important, not what actually was.

Meeting transcripts are the highest-value data stream most businesses completely ignore. Every verbal agreement, every client signal, every commitment made in a room full of people disappears the moment the call ends. What remains is a shared memory that degrades by the hour.

Transcript analysis reads every word from every meeting. It surfaces the decisions that were made, the actions that were promised, the revenue signals that appeared, and then it tracks which of those actually resulted in follow-through. The gap between "what was said" and "what was done" is where meetings waste the most value.

47%
Meeting action items that are never completed. Nearly half of every commitment is forgotten.
28%
Client meetings with cross-sell or expansion signals that nobody follows up on.
62%
Meetings that overrun their scheduled time without producing a documented outcome.
3.1x
Variance in meeting productivity between the most and least effective teams.

Meetings are powerful
Meetings + another stream is transformational

A decision made in a meeting is only as valuable as the action that follows it. When meeting transcripts are connected to email data, verbal commitments become trackable. The gap between what was promised and what was delivered becomes visible for the first time.

Meetings

Decisions, commitments, client signals, action items

+

Emails

Follow-up trails, response gaps, execution evidence

=

Accountability Intelligence

Every commitment tracked from verbal promise to documented delivery

Meetings + Emails

A partner agrees with a client to send a revised proposal by Monday. No email is sent by Wednesday. The client sends a follow-up chase. The proposal arrives on Friday, 4 days late, with no acknowledgment of the delay.

Single stream: "Late proposal." Both streams: "Verbal commitment broken, client trust eroding, pattern repeated 3 times this quarter."

Meetings + CRM

A client mentions in a quarterly review that they are opening two new offices. Nobody updates the CRM opportunity record. Six weeks later, a competitor wins the work because your team forgot the signal existed.

Single stream: "Missed opportunity." Both streams: "Verbal expansion signal with zero CRM activity. Quantified revenue loss."

Meetings + Messaging

A team meeting produces 8 action items. Slack messages show 3 were discussed further. Email shows 2 were actually delivered. Five items from a 60-minute meeting simply vanished.

Single stream: "Incomplete notes." Three streams: "62% meeting output waste. Systemic follow-through failure."

What Your Meeting Data Reveals

Patterns that emerge when every meeting transcript is analysed, not just the ones someone remembered to minute.

Revenue Blind Spots

Cross-sell signals in client meetings, never actioned. Clients mention expansion plans, new requirements, or budget approvals during routine reviews. In 28% of meetings analysed, these signals were acknowledged verbally but never followed up with a proposal or next step.

Decision delays costing deals. Prospects agree in principle during a meeting, but the follow-up takes so long that momentum dies. Analysis reveals the average gap between verbal agreement and written confirmation is 9 working days. By then, competitors have moved.

Competitor intelligence shared verbally, never captured. Clients mention competitor names, pricing, and service comparisons during meetings. This intelligence is shared freely but never reaches your sales strategy because it lives only in the transcript.

Capacity Blind Spots

Meeting overrun patterns draining the diary. 62% of meetings exceed their scheduled duration. For senior partners billing at high hourly rates, every 15-minute overrun across 8 daily meetings adds up to 2 hours of unbillable capacity lost per day.

Duplicate meetings covering the same ground. Different teams hold separate meetings about the same client issue, unaware the conversation has already happened. Transcript analysis detects topic overlap across meetings, surfacing redundancy that wastes hours weekly.

Senior staff time spent below their pay grade. Partners and directors sitting in operational update meetings that could be handled by a written summary. Analysis shows which meeting types produce outcomes and which are attendance-only habits.

Experience Blind Spots

Client sentiment in meetings vs surveys. Clients express frustration, satisfaction, or concern verbally in meetings far more honestly than they do in formal surveys. Transcript sentiment analysis captures what NPS scores miss entirely.

Follow-through on promises made to clients. Commitments are made during client meetings. Analysis tracks whether those commitments appear in subsequent emails, CRM updates, or deliverables. The gap between what was said and what was done defines your client's real experience.

Meeting quality variance across teams. Some teams run structured meetings that produce clear outcomes. Others hold free-form discussions that produce nothing documented. The variance in meeting effectiveness is invisible without transcript analysis.

Four Patterns Hiding in Every Transcript

These findings appear in every meeting data set we analyse. Your transcripts contain the same patterns.

The Decision That Never Happened

Agreed in the Room, Lost in the Corridor

Six people agree on a new pricing approach during a strategy meeting. No one documents it. No email confirms it. Three weeks later, two different versions of the decision are being referenced by different teams. The original intent is gone.

47% of meeting decisions have no documented follow-through
The Revenue Signal

Client Mentioned Expansion. Nobody Followed Up.

During a quarterly review, a client mentions they are opening two new offices and will need to scale services accordingly. The partner nods, says "let us come back to that," and the meeting moves on. No proposal. No CRM note. The signal dies in the transcript.

28% of client meetings contain unactioned expansion signals
The Time Thief

12 Hours a Week in Meetings That Produce Nothing

A senior director attends 16 meetings per week. Analysis shows 8 of them produce no decisions, no action items, and no documented outcomes. That is 12 hours of a senior person's time consumed by meetings that could have been a summary email.

62% of meetings overrun with no documented outcome
The Knowledge Silo

Critical Context Trapped in One Person's Notes

A key account manager holds a 45-minute client call. The client shares concerns about service quality, mentions a competitor pitch, and requests a contract review. The account manager takes personal notes. They go on leave. Nobody else has the context.

Verbal context vanishes when the person who heard it is unavailable

From Recorded Meetings to Business Intelligence

Three steps. No workflow changes. No integration risk.

1

Connect

We plug into your existing meeting platform. Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or Google Meet. Read-only access to transcripts that are already being generated. No new recording tools, no changes to how your team runs meetings.

Read-only access
2

Analyse

Our digital analysts process every meeting transcript. Decisions are identified, action items are extracted, revenue signals are flagged, and sentiment patterns are tracked. Not a sample. Every meeting, every word.

100% coverage
3

See

Weekly reports showing which decisions need follow-through, which client signals need action, and where meeting time is being wasted. Prioritised findings with estimated business impact.

Weekly insights

Connects with your existing tools

Teams
Slack
Google Meet
HubSpot
Salesforce
Pipedrive

What You Might Be Thinking

"What about meeting privacy and confidentiality?"
Analysis operates at the pattern level. We surface decision gaps, follow-through failures, and productivity patterns. The insights are about meeting effectiveness and business outcomes, not about monitoring individuals. Data is processed with full GDPR compliance and appropriate data processing agreements.
"Do our team members need to consent to recording?"
We work with transcripts from meetings that are already being recorded on your platform. If your business already uses Teams, Zoom, or Google Meet with recording enabled, the transcripts already exist. We analyse what you have, not what you need to start capturing. Your existing consent framework covers the data.
"We already use a note-taking tool for meetings"
Note-taking tools capture what someone decided to write down. Transcript analysis captures everything that was said. The gap is significant: note-takers miss revenue signals, skip uncomfortable commitments, and summarise decisions in ways that lose nuance. Analysis reads the full conversation, not the filtered summary.
"How do we know the insights are worth the investment?"
Professional services firms typically bill partners at rates where 30 minutes of wasted meeting time per day exceeds the cost of the entire analysis. The findings pay for themselves by surfacing one missed revenue signal or eliminating one unnecessary recurring meeting. Most clients see clear value within the first two weeks of analysis.

Every Meeting Has a Story. Most of Them Go Unread.

Connect your meeting data stream. Get your first insights within 14 days. Then see what happens when you add a second stream.

Book a Discovery Call Get Your Analysis

30-minute call. We will show you one finding from your own data before you commit to anything.